تناسب مضمون و زمان در «زمان‌ساخت» روایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی ره، قزوین، ایران.

2 استادیار، زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی ره، قزوین، ایران.

چکیده

دیدگاه پژوهش حاضر نگاهی دیگر به مفهوم زمان در ادبیات و هدف آن مطالعه و تبیین روساخت و ژرف ساخت روایت‌های داستانی با تمسک به عنصر «زمانْ­ ساخت» است. نگارنده بر این باور است که علاوه بر زمان حادثه و  زمان روایت، زمان سومی نیز -با تکیه بر فضا، حادثه و مضمون- در داستان وجود دارد که حاصل عجین­ شدگی حادثه با زمان رخداد آن در بیرون داستان است؛ به طوری که گاه نویسنده با ظرافت بین حوادث تلخ در زمستان یا شب و خوشی‌ها در بهار یا روشنایی روز ارتباط برقرار کرده و این تلفیق- که البته صور گوناگونی دارد-به «زمانْ­ ساخت» تعبیر می‌‌گردد. آنچه اساس پژوهش حاضر را تشکیل می‌دهد، چگونگی تولید معنا بر اثر این دگردیسی زمانی مبتنی بر فضا و حادثه و عجین‌شدگی آن با زمان طبیعت در ادبیات داستانی است و نگارنده کوشیده است با ذکر شواهد محدود (اما دقیق)، ضمن تحلیل ابعاد «زمانْ­ ساخت» در روایت‌ها، فرایند تولید معنا را مورد تبیین قرار دهد. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان می‌دهد که، تناسب مضمون و زمان در ادبیات داستانی منجر به ساختارهای روایی چهارگانه‌ای می‌شود که در فرایند خلق معنا دخیل هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relevance of Theme and Time in Narrative "Time Construction"

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gelareh Gangizadeh 1
  • Fazlollah Khodadadi 2
  • Yaser Dalvand 2
1 M.A. student of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Imam Khomeini International, Qazvin, Iran.
2 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Imam Khomeini International, Qazvin, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The point of view of the present research is another look at the concept of time in literature and its purpose is to study and explain the surface construction and deep construction of narratives by insisting on the element of “Time Construction.” The author believes that in addition to the time of the incident and the time of the narration, there is also a third time - based on the space, incident and theme - in the story, which is the result of the interweaving of the incident with the time of its occurrence outside the story. In other words, sometimes the author delicately makes a connection between bitter events in winter or night and happiness in spring or daylight, and this combination - which of course has various forms - is interpreted as "Time Construction." What forms the basis of the current research is how to produce meaning as a result of this time transformation based on space and incident and its interweaving with the time of nature in fiction literature. The author has tried by citing limited (but accurate) evidence, while analyzing the dimensions of "Time Construction" in narratives, to explain the process of producing meaning. The results of the present research show that the appropriateness of theme and time in fiction leads to four narrative structures that are involved in the process of creating meaning.
Introduction:
Narrative is one of the easiest and most practical tools for humans to express events, internal states, and sensory experiences. It has permeated not only the realm of imagination but also the reality of modern life. According to Brannon Thomas, “narrative is one of the pillars of our identity as humans and is fundamentally important for understanding how time is processed in our minds, as well as for the functioning of memory and our perception of our own identity” (Thomas 1400:19). Narrative has multiple dimensions and is evident in cinema, literature, history, theater, and more.
One of the categories and subtle elements in narratives is the element of “time”. The element of time in narrative includes two areas: “story time (measured by century, day, hour, etc.) and the number of lines and pages) (Zhou, 2015, p. 51). Story time refers to the chronological time of events, which is a quantitative dimension and can be measured using tools. The purpose of this study is to examine the concept of time from a different perspective. Rather than measuring the duration of events. The authors aim to explore the relationship between natural time and the fictional time within certain narratives. Our focus is on the narrated time in the story, which is anchored to an external temporal framework and is referred to as “constructed time” in narratology.
Methodology:
We believe that narrative involves a change in character, event, and time. In other words, a narrative involves a text that has a change at the end compared to the beginning, and this change sometimes occurs in character (a thief who repents), event (beginning with conflict and conflict, ending with calm and tranquility), or time (night-day/winter-spring).
The present research focuses on the study of superstructure (the plot structure of the narrative) and deep structure (the analysis of time structure and its relationship with other story elements in the process of meaning production). Its goal is to examine the relationship between the type of event, in terms of content, and the timing of its occurrence in natural time.
Results and Discussion:
The transition from bitter events in winter and night to happiness in spring and summer, or vice versa, is a prominent feature of this narrative category. An in-depth analysis of this transition leads to the creation of meaning and its artistic application, revealing the hidden structural elements within the narratives. The research results also indicate that there are fixed forms of the relationship between time and incident in the narratives, which contribute to the production of meaning. For example, bitter narratives often begin in winter or at night and continue through the bitterness of these times, typically lacking a happy ending. Conversely, narratives that start in spring are filled with joy and happiness and conclude in spring.
The present research identifies four distinct forms of the relationship between time and incident (time-structure) and examines their roles in the deep structure of narratives and the production of meaning. Beyond being a key component in narrative formation, the element of time also significantly influences the relationship between incident and meaning production. The explanation of the superstructure and deep structure of narratives reveals another hidden form of time called "time-structure", which shows the temporal context of the formation of events in calendar time (day and night and seasons) in stories and shares a kind of interweaving between external time and the themes of the event in the narrative.
Conclusion:
The element of time, in addition to being one of the influential components in the formation of narratives, also plays a significant role in the relationship between the event and the production of meaning. The explanation of the superstructure and deep structure of narratives expresses another hidden form of time under the title of "time-structure", which shows the temporal context of the formation of events in calendar time (day and night and seasons) in stories and shares a kind of interweaving between external time and the themes of the event in the narrative.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Narrative Science
  • Time
  • Zeitstruktur
  • Meaning production
اسلامی، اسماعیل. (1404) «بررسی عنوان، آغاز و پایان در داستان­های محمود تیمور و جمال­زاده»، پژوهشنامه ادبیات داستانی، دوره چهاردهم، شماره 2، پیاپی 52، 25-1. https://doi.org/10.22126/rp.2025.11532.2042
بارت، رولان و دیگران. (1400) درآمدی به روایت ­شناسی، ترجمه هوشنگ رهنما، تهران: هرمس.
بامشکی، سمیرا. (1392) روایت­ شناسی داستان­های مثنوی، تهران: هرمس.
بهرنگی، صمد. (1384) قصه­های بهرنگ، تهران: روزبهان.
پاینده، حسین. (1391) داستان کوتاه در ایران (داستان­های رئالیستی و ناتورالیستی)، تهران: نیلوفر.
تامس، برانون. (1400) روایت مفاهیم بنیادی و روش­های تحلیل، ترجمه حسین پاینده، تهران: مروارید.
چتمن، سیمور. (1390) داستان و گفتمان، ترجمه راضیه سادات میرخندان، تهران: مرکز پژوهش­های اسلامی صدا و سیما.
چوبک، صادق. (1352) روز اول قبر، تهران: جاویدان.
ژنت، ژرار. (1400). گفتمان حکایت- جستاری در تبیین روش، مترجمان: آذین حسین­ زاده، کتایون شهپر راد، تهران: نیلوفر.
ژوو، ونسان. (1394) بوطیقای رمان، ترجمه نصرت حجازی، تهران: علمی فرهنگی.
شعیری، حمید رضا. (1392) تجزیه و تحلیل  نشانه- معناشناسی گفتمان، تهران: سمت.
فلکی، محمود. (1382) روایت داستان- تئوری­های پایۀ داستان ­نویسی، تهران: بازتاب نگار.
قاسمی­پور، قدرت الله. (1387) «زمان و روایت»، نقد ادبی، ش2، 143-122.
کافکا، فرانتس. (1392) داستان­های کوتاه کافکا، ترجمۀ علی اصغر حداد، تهران: ماهی.
میرزا ابوالقاسمی، محمد صادق. (1386) «زمستان در ادبیات و بازتاب آن در نقاشی ایرانی»، نگره، شماره 5، 89-77.