Different Views of Contrastive Structure of Signs in Ermia

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Semnan University, semnan, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Semnan University, semnan, Iran

3 Ph.D. Student in Persian Language and Literature, Semnan University, semnan, Iran

Abstract

“Binary oppositions” are resulted from Saussure’s doctrines and indicates that the work’s intellectual totality is based on opposite pairs. Pairs including “black/white”, “truth/lie”, and “poor/rich”. Binary oppositions are seen within the substrates of the phenomena such as language, society, thought, behavior, and culture; makes them meaningful and generates communicational gateways, forming sign systems and special patterns. Binaries are effective in code organizing and highlighting the signs. “Ermia” the first novel written by Reza Amirkhani, is the description of a warrior’s mental challenges in matching teachings of the holy defense (Iran-Iraq War) with some facts of Iranian society after the security council resolution 598 that led to ceasefire and the people who were involved. The trace of binary appositions and its practical elegance are appreciated in the configuration of novel’s incidents. The present research applying a descriptive-analytical method, first of all explains three sets of codes associating with novel’s conflicting thoughts in order to access the hidden layers of text, then categorizes, decodes, and analyzes binary oppositions in two categories of “personalities” (Mostafa/Ermia, Ermia’s family/Ermia, Moammar/Ermia, Shahin/Ermia, Mostafa/other friends, the families away from war/the families involved in war, Kavoos/Ermia, Ermia in the past/Ermia of today) and “places” (the front/the city, north of city/south of city, Ermia’s trench/Ermia’s home, front/university, city/rock quarry) and finally explains the consequences of oppositional relations of signs within the formation of three viewpoints: “passive”, “responsible”, and “concerned”.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ahmadi, B. (2007). The Text-structure and textural Interpretation. Tehran: Markaz. [In  Persian]
Ahmadi, B. (2008). Structure and Hermeneutics. Tehran: Gam-e no. [In Persian]
Amirkhani, R. (2018). Ermia. Tehran: Ofogh. [In Persian]
Azimifard, F. (2013). Descriptive Dictionary of Semiotics. Tehran: Elmi. [In Persian]
Barthes, R. (1973). The Pleasure of the Text (p. Yazdankhah, trans.). Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian]
Bertens, J. W. (2005). Literaty Theory: the basics ( M. R. Abolghasemi, trans.). Tehran: Mahi. [In Persian]
Chaharmahali, M. &Shabanzadeh, M. (2019). Analysis of Binary Oppositions in Jamshid's  Story based on Levi Strauss’s Theory.Textual criticism of Persian literature,(1), pp.15-35.
Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: the Basics (M. Parsa, trans.).Tehran:SooreMehr.[In Persian]
Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary Theory: An Introduction (A. Mokhber, trans.). Tehran: Markaz.[In Persian]
Eco, U. (2018). Sign: History and Analysis of a Concept (A. Mehrabi, trans.). Tehran :Elmifarhangi. [In Persian]
Fotoohi, M. (2016). Stylistics: theories, approaches, and methods. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
Ghasemi, Sh. (2019). Investigating The Structure Of The Plot In Ermia's Novel Based On New Patterns In Structuralism And Narrative. Persian language and literature. (72), pp. 75-101.
Ghani, G. S., Ahmadi, M. & Akbari, M. (2015). Aesthetic Analysis of Some Story Elements in Three of Reza Amirkhani's Novels (Ermia, Man-E- Ou, Bivatan).  Pizhuhish-izabanvaadabiyyat-i  Farsi. (37), pp. 55-88.
HassanzadehMirali, A. (2015). A Study and Analysis toward Expressionism in Ermia by Reza Amirkhani. Narrative studies, (3), pp. 77-92.
Hejazi, B. (2011). A Critique On Two Novels Of Reza Amirkhani. Researches in mystical literature, (5), pp. 99-123.
Kamari, A. (2011). The Semiotic Study of Holy War / Sacred Defense. Tehran: SooreMehr ,pp-25-40.
Koopa, F. (2011). Symbolic Motif and Narrative Techniques in the Novel of “Ermia”, a    HolyDefense story. Journal of resistance literature, (3&4), pp. 479-503.
Maharyk, I. R. (1993). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches, Scholars, Terms (M.Mohajer& M. Nabavi, trans.). Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
Miller, A. (2015). Contemporary cultural theory: an introduction (J. Mohammadi, trans.). Tehran: Ghoghnoos. [In Persian]
Okhovat, A. (2013). The Grammar of Stories. Isfahan: Farda. [In Persian]
RahmdelSharafshadehi, G. (2006). A New Perspective to the Fiction of “Zal and Roodabe”. Journal of research in Persian language and literature, (13), pp. 11-24.
Rezaei, M &Kheiri, F. (2017). A Stylistic Study of the Novel "Ermia" by Reza Amirkhani. Journal of resistance literature, (17), pp. 134-156.
Safavi, K. (2015). Literature and Semiotics: An Introduction.Tehran:Elmi. [In Persian]
Segal, R. A. (2004). Myth: a Very Short Introduction (F. Farnoodfar, trans.). Tehran: Basirat. [In Persian]
Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics. (K. Safavi, trans.). Tehran:Hermes.[In Persian]
Shairi, H. R. (2017). AnalyseSémiotique du Discours. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Shekardast, F. et al. (2014). An Approach in Aanalysis and Criticism of Islamic Revolution Literature Emphasizing on Reza Amirkhani’s Novels. Persian language and literature. (33), pp. 183-212.
Shojaei, M. (1994), The Interactive Relationship between Fiction and War, Seminar on the study of war novels, Kermanshah: Islamic Revolution Veterans Foundation.
Sojoodi, F. (2008). Applied Semiotics. Tehran: Elm. [In Persian]
Sojoodi, F. (2009). Semiotics: Theory and practice. Tehran: Elm. [In Persian]
Strinati, D. (2001). An introduction to theories of popular culture. (S. Paknazar, trans.). Tehran: Gam-e No. [In Persian]
Todorov, T. (1975). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (M. Nabavi, trans.). Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
Yoonesi, E, (2000). Art of writing story. Tehran: Negah. [In Persian]
Zamiran, M. (2003). An introduction to art semiotics. Tehran: Ghesseh. [In Persian]